Nhờ sửa bài giúp

I agree with this law because I think everyone who has (have?) a certain age in whinch is no longer able to continue naturally with his forces, has the right to not survive for a long-agonizing death.

(I try to do it long) Is the worst way for a man to leave the world, because he wouldn't leave the earth in peace as it would be.

But in the other hand it would be also right (is also right), that is not too easy to set the limits and edges where we can act.

For this reason there should be some rules.

But the rules, I think, shouldn't be do from politicians, but from a true team of expecialist in medicine.

And also Church shouldn't put any word about, because the issues round the gift (dono) of life were made before the medicine get to the point where we are nowadays, and the things change.

I think that, things, when it can or the limits of survival allows, should be the most possible natural.

Therefore if the are good motifs to stay a living person, it's just to try if there possibilities, if not (otherwise, or else) nothing.

And every case should be ruled by a comittee (commissione) and last choice should be made by the family.

(it would be for the family)