It is thought that tourists should pay more than people, who lived in a country, for visiting historical or popular locations.
However, another people think that everyone should pay the same amount of money.
I am going to discuss both points of view and give arguments for supporting premium prices for foreign visitors.
First of all, the most important advantage of high prices for sightseers is a good income for the government.
For instance, some tourists, who visit a foreign country, have money which they have already decided to spend on leisure activities.
Therefore, they are not noticed the difference in costs.
Mover At the same time the government gets extra taxes.
That money can be used for supporting cultural objects and the poor.
In addition, that money can be also spent on finding new ancient items and locations.
On the other hand, some people consider that premium prices are unfair.
Sometimes, tourists do not have extra money for visiting cultural and historical places.
To illustrate, it could be a person who has a religious motive to visit spiritual objects, but do not have enough money.
Therefore, he or she could not afford to pay the premium.
As a result, the rights among members of a society would not be equal which could create tensions in a society.
In conclusion, there are such numerous popular places in the world which attract people to visit them.
However, I agree with the opinion that tourists should pay extra money, because it helps to support historical locations and the poor.
March 2014
Vote now! 