NB> please correct real mistakes and 'they do not speak so' and not ways of speaking
I’m not Charlie at least because I’m not a dirty pig.
What was doing ‘Charlie’ had nothing to do with freedom of speech.
It wasn’t even an art, just a pure and primitive porno-style provocation aiming to get some easy money by attracting quite stupid, narrow-minded and vulgar people.
I say more, Charlie was, and unfortunately still is, the biggest enemy to the real freedom of speech in France and elswere in western countries.
Charlie’s dirty and utterly unskilled job was profaning the notion of freedom of speech.
Freedom is not a value by itself.
When it is, it turns into tyranny.
To jeer at values meaning even more than a human being’s life for millions of people is not freedom nor liberty.
It is a direct and very brutal offence to millions of people.
There is only one step from what were doing those cartoonists to what have done those terrorists with their ‘kalashnikovs’.
When human being’s soul gets so low it is about to kill another human being.
Yes, Charlie Hebdo was a terrorist too.
Maybe what have done those men with ‘kalashikovs’ also was a kind of freedoom and liberty of self-expression?
Don’t you think so? Why not?
Just because the law forbid this?
Liberty is a subtle thing and eternal matter to philosophers.
Living in a civilised society assumes having some degree of simple respect towards other people.
Any civilised society practices all kinds of limits and bans.
None civilised society gets along without it.
I condemn the terrible murder which happened in Paris.
But what we are witnessing now?
Instead of making hero, for example, of this policeman who died defending people, they are praising now ‘Charlie Hebdo’ and the ‘freedom of speech’ à la ‘Charlie Hebdo’ i.e. freedom to brutally offend other people.
But even this barbaric consideration of what is liberty and freedom is not applied to everyone.
While some jokers are praised, other jokers, like Dieudonne, are persucuted for just the same thing – bad joke.