Korigjime

Hello everyone.

I introduce myself, my name is Laura Duraes, and I am a student at UTBM.

Today, I will therefore present a rather original subject speaking about art.

According to an article in "artnetnews", published March 9, 2015 by Lorena Monoz, "the origin of the world" was a scandal from Facebook.

I will explain briefly the scandal that everyone can understand what I mean.

In 201, the social network, Facebook, censorship on behalf of a school teacher for publishing the painting of a female.

This teacher wanted to convey his passion for art in the posting.

However, he decided to complain to the Tribunale, against this network, for violation of freedom of expression.

Finally, Facebook was judged to have been abusive.

In my presentation I will explain my parts, my next problem is: in the name of freedom of expression, can we say everything, do everything in Art?

First, I would present some works that have been censored, or very criticized.

Then I would try to explain why he was there censorship or criticism about art.

And finally, I'll talk about whether we can or not, prohibit disclosure of any kind of artistic expression.

First, I'm going to play you some work on paintings, photography, sculptures or art exhibitions.

All his works have been very crtiquées see interditent to public disclosure.

I specify you before starting my presentation, that people can be queslques embarrassed or shocked by them.

For the first painting "Mother-year daughter" Diane Ducret was decided not to be hung in the artist's painting.

(A vernissage is a private opening to expose the paintings).

In a comment from a mécontant sender, the table had to be removed from the exhibition.

He said he did not want to see this painting in honor of incest victims and associations representing them.

While the artist wanted to show the continuity of his past work between symbiotic love of his family.

When Life Art POP exhibit in the Material World, which opened in October 2009 at the Tate Modern in London, Brooke Shields of photography has not had the opportunity to be seen in its entirety.

The photo of the starlet, then aged 10 at the time, was an ambiguity.

His mother sold the photo for $ 450 and has published his daughter in the book Playboy.

Now the actress is trying to stop the flow of this picture.

But why the censor?

Today we made a connection with the arrest of Roman Polanski.

He did a media scandal da his conviction for raping a 13-year adolescante in 1977.

The album Nirvana Nervermind etet has censored a time by the social network Facebook.

The mythical pocket posted on the official page of the group suddenly disappeared.

Facebook does not allow pictures in contravention of an individual or a group of people.

This album has been censored by the penis of the baby revealed during his swim.

This work is therefore a scupture with King of Spain Juan Carlos, on all fours on a mat vomiting by syndicate.

The director Mari Bartole meu who wished to withdraw this work, presented as part of the beast and the exposure 2la souverrain.

"He found this scupture inadequate and contrary to the editorial line of the museum.

The Commissioners refused remove it and so the director decided to cancel the exhibition.

Proposed for the first expostion of the American Society indépendats artists in New York in 1917, she was censored.

This scupture was mentioned as an immoral and vulgar object and it is said that not a commercial and not artistic piece.

The picture went around the world because it has long been censored.

This "kiss Cops" is the Russian exhibition "Art fools." Therefore, the Russian government prohibited the disclosure outside the territory, as it was part for display at home Rouge, an exhibition in Paris.

This image has been viewed as a pornographic work, and it called the shame for Russia.

Why forbid ourselves or give negative opinions on tables Art.

Each person has a different behavior that is not at all the same.

People will be shocked or may -be other will cry seeing the same table. But Why?

Some people may feel angry at what he sees.

They therefore express a hidden hostility that is not assumed or lived.

But as in my previous slide, we prohibit some free expressions, because it does not divulge violence, drugs, alcohol, and also nudity.

Some countries may prohibit exposing because it is forbidden by their religion or custom.

Then, it is also a reason not to criticize or make fun of a person or a group of individuals.

To conclude, art is a freedom of expression that serves to flourish, to communicate a message to others.

However, some states decide to ban and censor broadcasts who think harmful for the country or for the community.

Article 19 gives no law or real limits for the disclosure of works.

Each state decides to interpret these limits.

I show you the different sources I have used to achieve my slideshow.