Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.
Discuss both sides give your opinion.
Owning the problem of pollution, some people believe that it should be faced in a global way, instead others think that is better confront it nationally.
In my opinion, i completely agree that a global scale solution is the best way to tackle the issue of pollution.
Firstly, pollution is not just a national problem, but a global issue.
Therefore, it needs to be faced globally.
If we think on the biggest environmental problems we all agree that it is not a one nation faults.
In fact all more advanced countries are causing large issues.
Starting from Italy, Pianura Padana is one of the most polluted territory in the world.
On the other hand, if it would deal nationally; every state can face just its problems.
This is so better for little countries who has not this kind of issues, but which have a lot of other problems.
I am thinking about the little african countries, which have poverty and hunger troubles.
As the hunger and the poverty have to be faced globally, and we all know how many associations are helping these states, the same thing it would must happen on the environmental field.
Furthermore, these organizations are helping with money and food.
Things are improving and i am sure that in some years it will be totally solved.
In conclusion, non-profit organizations, helped by states and biggest community, have to face the problem globally, avoiding to leave issues to each nation.
We have to stay together for a bigger purpose, because environmental problems are our problems.
We can not just stay fixed and looking what is going to happen in the next few years.
We all have to contribute for a better world doing what is necessary everyday.
The entire world has to change its mind and try to be better and increase itself awareness.
January 2016
Ψηφίστε τώρα! 