수정본

HELP TO CORRECT NOW!수정되지 않은

Englishfun (으)로 부터 도착한메세지 - English

  • Driverless cars

  • In recent years the driverless car, as it can be seen in some science-fiction movies, is already a reality.
  • This technology is not yet allowed on the majority of roads and needs to be further developed because it causes some ethics problems.
  • “Driverless cars need a crash course in ethics” is an article published in The Time, the August 13th 2016.
  • This article talks about the evaluation of the driverless cars moral choices during an accident.
  • It explains that the choices algorithm of a driverless car must not only have a technical dimension but also a moral dimension.
  • In fact, during an accident, the moral dimension is very important because, referring to the first sentence of this article “Impending road accidents require drivers to make split-second decisions, calculating which action will cause the least damage”.
  • The question that we can asked us with driverless cars is: what do we tell the car to do in the event of complex life-and-death decision?
  • This article explains that the French and American researchers conducted a study to know what the public decide to save between pedestrians and passengers of car in event of a self-driving car being involved in an accident in order to provoke a public discussion around the questions of regulating artificial intelligence.
  • Scenarios of accident are ethically complex and involve difficult driverless cars decisions because the program doesn’t have a real social dimension.
  • This articles also explains that Scientifics have created a simulator named “The Moral Machine” in order to collect the decisions of people during an accident.
  • About 150,000 respondents answered 13 randomly generated questions and, each questions was an evil situation.
  • The results are collected for improve the moral choices of the driverless car.
  • However there appear to be cultural differences in the moral choices.
  • For example, some people even choose to spare animals over humans because they own pets and are adamant on protecting pets at all cost.
  • That is why the society will have to deal with strike an acceptable balance

각 문장을 수정해주세요! - English

  • 제목
  • 문장 1
  • 문장 2
    • This technology is not yet allowed on the majority of roads and needs to be further developed because it causes some ethics problems.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 2ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 2
  • 문장 3
  • 문장 4
  • 문장 5
    • It explains that the choices algorithm of a driverless car must not only have a technical dimension but also a moral dimension.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 5ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 5
  • 문장 6
    • In fact, during an accident, the moral dimension is very important because, referring to the first sentence of this article “Impending road accidents require drivers to make split-second decisions, calculating which action will cause the least damage”.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 6ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 6
  • 문장 7
    • The question that we can asked us with driverless cars is: what do we tell the car to do in the event of complex life-and-death decision?
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 7ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 7
  • 문장 8
    • This article explains that the French and American researchers conducted a study to know what the public decide to save between pedestrians and passengers of car in event of a self-driving car being involved in an accident in order to provoke a public discussion around the questions of regulating artificial intelligence.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 8ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 8
  • 문장 9
    • Scenarios of accident are ethically complex and involve difficult driverless cars decisions because the program doesn’t have a real social dimension.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 9ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 9
  • 문장 10
    • This articles also explains that Scientifics have created a simulator named “The Moral Machine” in order to collect the decisions of people during an accident.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 10ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 10
  • 문장 11
  • 문장 12
  • 문장 13
  • 문장 14
    • For example, some people even choose to spare animals over humans because they own pets and are adamant on protecting pets at all cost.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 14ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 14
  • 문장 15