The development of scientific and technical progress threatens existence of archives and libraries.
I think thatmodern people don't need places for reading books.
You would probably agree with me that electronic book isa useful, valuable and advantageous inventor.
You want to read a new novel, but you don't have money for purchase of this bestseller or you don't have free time for going to a library.
Using the Internet every man has the opportunity for downloading the book that he wants.
I can't but agree that archieves are places of concentration of different information.
The looking for necessary knowledge may takeseveral hours.
Doyouknow a contemporary person who hasone or more free hours? No, I don't.
I prefer reading, wrapoedmyself in a plaid and drunk a cup of tee.
In the library I can't relax and enjoy the book.
I think always how I look.
In the presence of other people I have hardships with concentration.
Some opponents might contend thatthere are a lot of historical documents, ancient books, the biilsof the pastin archives.
For scientists the existence of libraries is important for their academic activities.
However, I disagree withthese contention.
We shouldn't underestimate that science is constantly evolving.
Modern people can't know how they will live in a year.
Presumably, in a few years everybody will be able to explore historical documents by the Internet.
This innovation will makeeasier scholarly work.
In conclusion, I want to say that the future is for computer technologies.
October 2016
Vote now! 