Nhờ sửa bài giúp

Collectors prize the life –size clay state that the value of the life – size sculptures will decrease due to the recent discovery of molds on Kali Island.

It is believed that life –size sculptures were made by molds, and not sculpting tools and techniques.

In contract, few sculpting tools discovered and miniatures are different from life – size sculptures.

For these reasons, the value of the miniatures will increase.

However, this argument is problematic in several respects.

First of all, in order to determine if the author, s assumptions are reasonable, it is essential to assess author's reasons and also find other possible reasons to clarify the argument.

Simply because founding few molds of human heads and hands, does not mean that all of life – size sculptures on kali Island were made by molds.

Perhaps, Kalinese artists used molds in order to design a simple part of the bodies such as heads and hands and probably they used some sculpting tools and techniques in order to shape other parts of the body.

It is not clear that all of life – size sculptures are mold or just partly mold.

If this is the case, a decline in value of life-size sculptures is a false assumption.

Moreover, there is no any evident that molds and bodies have same size and texture.

Perhaps, that is such is true, evidence, it is entirely possible that life- size sculptures were not molds.

Thus, the value of life- size sculptures is unclear.

Furthermore, if all pieces of evidence turn out to prove the two author's assumptions, yet there is a murky point on this argument.

There is no evident that molds made by Kalinese artists.

Perhaps, it is possible that other ancient people made these molds and even these molds moved from another island to Kali island.

Thus, without addressing these issues, the author's conclusion can be dismissed out of hand.

In addition to this, the argument can be better evaluated if it can be known that other avenues of either beauty of these statues or subject matter and material have been explored or decided unworkable.

It is important to know all these factors because, as a definition, the value of a sculpture or miniature depends on the artist, age, subject matter and type of material, all these would help to determine value.

This is another failure of begin able to evaluate the owner 's argument is that reader is missing some vital information about these works.

While it states that life –size sculptures will decrease in value and miniatures increase in value, the argument fails to discuss whether or not all these factors contribute to the value of life –size sculptures and miniatures.

For example, rather that determining value by the collectors, has the possibility of hiring sculptures specialists in order to determine the value of these works been considered?

By itself ,the argument is weak in making evidence for these assumptions to follow the predication provided in order to the determination of works value.As is such, the link between the predication and the evidence is not clear.