Nhờ sửa bài giúp

Today's societies are acted with different thought structures in order to evaluate the right and wrong.

People think by adding social norms, environmental factors, personal special situations to find the way to go straight.

Humans can show various differences due to their cultures, religions, and languages, but they deserve to be treated everywhere with humanity and equality.

Ethical Relativism and Ethical Universalism are two opposing concepts.

Ethical relativism judges incidents by looking at the times, times, cultures, and ethical universalism, judging that things are equal for people.

These two opposing views use completely different methods when they are bad and good.

Ethical Relativism is making a subjective approach to distinguishing good evil.

'' Moral relativists argue that there is no universal rule that defines right and wrong.

Instead, morality is determined by the standards of a person's own authorities.

These authorities might be a government, a religion or even a family member.

'' (Http://www.tailoredcontent.com/library/metaethics.php).

If we exemplify this, euthanasia is a good example.

Euthanasia is banned in Turkey People in Switzerland are legally able to demand that they are treated with drugs.

The reason for being prohibited in Turkey is primarily religious factors.

Since Turkey believes in the religion of Islam, it advocates the death of a person with a profound and totally opposes the euthanasia.

In Switzerland, euthanasia is a good solution to stop people suffering, and it is legal.

According to Switzerland, euthanasia is wrong for Turkish laws.

Here is a subjective approach.

Relativism judges the situation according to environmental and cultural factors rather than accepting a single truth.

In a nutshell, a relativist thinks that what is right for you may be wrong for me because we are born in different countries, we have different cultures, we believe in different gods.

On the other hand, ethical universalism is explained as '' Moral Universalism is the meta-ethical position that there is a universal ethic which applies to all people, regardless of culture, race, sex, religion, nationality, sexuality or other distinguishing feature and all The time ''.

Http://www.philosophybasics.com/branch_moral_universalism.html This point draws attention to the universality of man.

The first article of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: '' All people are born free, equal in dignity and rights.

Those who have reason and conscience should treat each other with an understanding of brotherhood.

'' No matter how different we are, we deserve no treatment at all.

Do not stereotype people, divide them into classes, we're gonna get rid of each other.

For example, throughout history, black people were treated differently just because of their color.

He was enslaved, the chain was shot.

Now, how can we accept that a person is hit by a chain because he is different from me?

He was created just like me and has the right to live like me.

This right should not change according to any culture, place or time.

As another example, there is a rich and poor distinction that we often live in today.

Unfortunately, while people in their pocket are treated more respectfully, poor people are looking at needy people.

After all, in my opinion, it should be done from an equal window instead of looking at different perspectives when determining good and evil for each person.

Our rich, our religion, our culture can create a diversity, but we are all people and this reality does not change anywhere in the world.

If we summarize all these things, human beings should be judged without subjectivism.

Our creation and our final invention will be the same no matter how rich, powerful or different we are.

The fact that a person is born in Asia or in America does not change the fact that he is human.

We have to have equal values ​everywhere.

For all these reasons, while the relative approach will cause us to misjudge our good and evil, it will change people, universality will maintain equality and order and keep people together.