수정본

HELP TO CORRECT NOW!수정되지 않은

fitti (으)로 부터 도착한메세지 - English

  • Summary

  • In this article, published on "The New York Times" website by Stephen Castle on October 2016, the author talks about the recent referendum of "Brexit".
  • Despite Britain's leaders have had royal prerogatives and power to make decisions for many years, the journalist argues if these ancient rules should be used to take Britain out of the european union.
  • On the one hand, the Prime Minister Mrs May in strongly convinced to follow the result of the referendum.
  • The royal prerogative will activate Article 50 of the European Union's treaty that will accellerate Brexit process.
  • On the other hand, lawmakers believe the referndum was just advisory and the majority of them wanted to remain in Europe.
  • The final decision should probably be found in the elimination od some prerogative powers.

각 문장을 수정해주세요! - English

  • 제목
  • 문장 1
    • In this article, published on "The New York Times" website by Stephen Castle on October 2016, the author talks about the recent referendum of "Brexit".
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 1ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 1
  • 문장 2
    • Despite Britain's leaders have had royal prerogatives and power to make decisions for many years, the journalist argues if these ancient rules should be used to take Britain out of the european union.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 2ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 2
  • 문장 3
  • 문장 4
    • The royal prerogative will activate Article 50 of the European Union's treaty that will accellerate Brexit process.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 4ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 4
  • 문장 5
    • On the other hand, lawmakers believe the referndum was just advisory and the majority of them wanted to remain in Europe.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 5ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 5
  • 문장 6