수정본

HELP TO CORRECT NOW!수정되지 않은

tomo2009 (으)로 부터 도착한메세지 - English

  • Liquidity

  • Liquidity Telus Corp. appears to be more liquid than BCE Inc. in terms of current ratio, even though the value is less than 1.
  • However both companies might have some liquidity problems since their current asset is less than their current liability.
  • Moreover, for the cash to current debt coverage, Telus is still more liquid than BCE because the company is generating relatively more cash to pay its debt.
  • Another metrics that shows high liquidity of Telus is the receivable turnover.
  • Telus is more efficient in collecting money from clients’ credits compared to BCE, which explains the reason why Telus has more cash in hand.
  • Similar to current ratio, both companies have low receivable turnovers, but this is not necessarily a negative trend of financial behavior because credit policies vary with companies.
  • If a company has a high receivable turnover on its financial report, it might not be able to sustain a good partnership with its clients; which is true for service companies.
  • However, investors may be interested in the credit policies offered by the companies since receivable turnover is still an important measurement for the financial status.
  • Solvency BCE has a higher debt to total asset ratio, which indicates that it is less solvent than Telus.
  • Both companies have ratios higher than 0.5, which means that more than half of the total asset is from debt.
  • This may suggest a high risk on companies’ operations because they would have more difficulty obtaining new loans for new projects.
  • Moreover, BCE is still less solvent since the time interest earned is lower than that of Telus.
  • Telus is more capable in repaying its debt.

각 문장을 수정해주세요! - English

  • 제목
  • 문장 1
    • Liquidity Telus Corp. appears to be more liquid than BCE Inc. in terms of current ratio, even though the value is less than 1.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 1ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 1
  • 문장 2
    • However both companies might have some liquidity problems since their current asset is less than their current liability.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 2ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 2
  • 문장 3
    • Moreover, for the cash to current debt coverage, Telus is still more liquid than BCE because the company is generating relatively more cash to pay its debt.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 3ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 3
  • 문장 4
  • 문장 5
    • Telus is more efficient in collecting money from clients’ credits compared to BCE, which explains the reason why Telus has more cash in hand.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 5ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 5
  • 문장 6
    • Similar to current ratio, both companies have low receivable turnovers, but this is not necessarily a negative trend of financial behavior because credit policies vary with companies.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 6ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 6
  • 문장 7
    • If a company has a high receivable turnover on its financial report, it might not be able to sustain a good partnership with its clients; which is true for service companies.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 7ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 7
  • 문장 8
    • However, investors may be interested in the credit policies offered by the companies since receivable turnover is still an important measurement for the financial status.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 8ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 8
  • 문장 9
  • 문장 10
  • 문장 11
    • This may suggest a high risk on companies’ operations because they would have more difficulty obtaining new loans for new projects.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 11ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 11
  • 문장 12
  • 문장 13