Corrections

In our society, were beginning to have a fearful and excited feeling towards the developpement of robots.

A lot of people are totally against because it may remplace the human being and the importance of relationships between people.

We can see that, obviously, some people have a bad approach of the internet.

Some of them are totally closed in their world and don't go out to see the real life.

They are shown as perfect examples for the decadance of humanity because of the technical ways to communicate.

I don't think the technical ways have to be prohibited.

I'd rather think that the way to use them are in cause.

We must change our habits, and not just accuse technique.

However, there are still a lot of ethic questions that we can't avoid.

I won't speak about genetical modifications and the progress of science which directly touch the human being but I'm wondering about the creation of robots and of artificial intelligence.

Are we trying to recreate the human being?

In nature, there are laws just as science and experimentation.

Which is the limit between what can only be created by nature and what can be created by humanity?

If the elements of nature can be calculated and if all this is just a math equation, the human's brain may be calculated one day, too.

The fact that it is complicated does not mean it would be impossible.

Can artificial intelligence be one day as elaborated as our brain?

A few time ago, I would not have considered seriously this delirious idea of robots' revolution.

Even though I still don't believe in that, I think we may create an artificial intelligence very performant.

There is a test about it which consist on a discussion between a human and a web robot.

To win the prize, the web robot has to be as human as possible so that his interlocuter can't know if he's speaking with a robot or with a human.

It's called the Loebner Prize.