수정본

HELP TO CORRECT NOW!수정되지 않은

inlai (으)로 부터 도착한메세지 - English

  • The trifocal model

  • Object of study for several disciplines, digital interfaces appear as a heterogeneous object: a human-computer dialogue, a reflection of a mental model, an instrument, a set of semiotic signs ...
  • All these dimensions, addressed individually by disciplinary approaches, have never been gathered in a common paradigmatic framework.
  • This thesis argues that interfaces, as a complex object of study, must be addressed in a framework capable of dealing with this complexity.
  • It proposes to do so by the Systemic Communication Theory and to think about not in terms of interface quality attributes (usability, communicability, conviviality...) but in terms of meanings.
  • This implies a human-centered model and provides an integrated point of view enabling the design of new interfaces as well as their implementation in numerous contexts and sensory modalities.
  • The trifocal model is thus a systemic approach to communication via the interface.
  • It studies the relationships between user and machine, between user and object of his activity and between user and designer, as well as emergent properties of the system.
  • The trifocal model provides an interface description transposable from one modality to another.
  • It allows, on one hand, to study the meaning of non-visual interfaces and, on the other, to translate interfaces from one modality to another.
  • The trifocal model takes a fresh look on designing accessible interfaces since it complements existing methods with new analytical dimensions.

각 문장을 수정해주세요! - English

  • 제목
  • 문장 1
    • Object of study for several disciplines, digital interfaces appear as a heterogeneous object: a human-computer dialogue, a reflection of a mental model, an instrument, a set of semiotic signs ...
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 1ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 1
  • 문장 2
    • All these dimensions, addressed individually by disciplinary approaches, have never been gathered in a common paradigmatic framework.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 2ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 2
  • 문장 3
    • This thesis argues that interfaces, as a complex object of study, must be addressed in a framework capable of dealing with this complexity.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 3ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 3
  • 문장 4
    • It proposes to do so by the Systemic Communication Theory and to think about not in terms of interface quality attributes (usability, communicability, conviviality...) but in terms of meanings.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 4ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 4
  • 문장 5
    • This implies a human-centered model and provides an integrated point of view enabling the design of new interfaces as well as their implementation in numerous contexts and sensory modalities.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 5ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 5
  • 문장 6
  • 문장 7
    • It studies the relationships between user and machine, between user and object of his activity and between user and designer, as well as emergent properties of the system.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 7ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 7
  • 문장 8
  • 문장 9
    • It allows, on one hand, to study the meaning of non-visual interfaces and, on the other, to translate interfaces from one modality to another.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 9ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 9
  • 문장 10
    • The trifocal model takes a fresh look on designing accessible interfaces since it complements existing methods with new analytical dimensions.
      투표하세요!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 10ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 10